• ChrisArchitect 15 hours ago
    [-]
    • camtarn 14 hours ago
      Not actually a dupe: unlike the story you linked, this article has a lot of background on the issue for those who don't follow Ruby community drama.
      [-]
      • ChrisArchitect 13 hours ago
        Then share it over there in the very large discussion. The point is the discussion is over there.
        [-]
        • camtarn 8 hours ago
          No, that serves a completely different purpose: I don't want to read through a very large discussion when this perfectly good article is here. Hence my point. You know this already, as you already change your wording depending on whether you're pointing to a duplicate article, or a valid article but where there's discussion elsewhere.

          You could just admit that you made a trivial mistake on a post that's already fallen off the front page, you know. And then we wouldn't both have wasted our time.