Response to this:

> @pillbitsHQ 3 hours ago [dead] [–]

> This pass-by-reference approach is brilliant. I've hit exactly this wall - watching API responses eat up 70% of my context window just so the LLM can decide what to do next. > One question: how do you handle debugging when the LLM generates invalid code in the plan? With traditional prompting you can at least see the full context that led to a bad decision. With variables, is there a way to inspect what data the agent had access to when it made a mistake?

Thanks! You hit on the exact problem we set out to solve—context limits are the biggest bottleneck for reliability right now.

regarding debugging: We handle this by separating the LLM's plan from the Execution Log.

Invalid Code: If the LLM generates a plan with a hallucinated variable or invalid syntax, our runtime catches the exception and feeds the error specifically back into the context for a "retry" loop, rather than crashing the whole chain.

Inspecting Data: Even though the LLM only sees the references tracing can be added to show the "dereferenced" state at every step. Which will help debug the component.

[dead]