JSLinux Now Supports x86_64(bellard.org)

150 points by TechTechTech 5 hours ago | 35 comments

  • simonw 2 hours ago
    The thing I most want to use this (or some other WASM Linux engine) for is running a coding agent against a virtual operating system directly in my browser.

    Claude Code / Codex CLI / etc are all great because they know how to drive Bash and other Linux tools.

    The browser is probably the best sandbox we have. Being able to run an agent loop against a WebAssembly Linux would be a very cool trick.

    I had a play with v86 a few months ago but didn't quite get to the point where I hooked up the agent to it - here's my WIP: https://tools.simonwillison.net/v86 - it has a text input you can use to send commands to the Linux machine, which is pretty much what you'd need to wire in an agent too.

    In that demo try running "cat test.lua" and then "lua test.lua".

    [-]
  • blackhaz 2 hours ago
    Sorry for the off-topic, but what a bliss to see Windows 2000 interface. And what an absolute abomination from hell pretty much all the modern UIs are.
    [-]
    • shevy-java 2 hours ago
      Yeah. Microsoft really went downhill UI-wise.
    • cheema33 1 hour ago
      Is that even remotely relevant to JSLinux?
      [-]
      • nout 1 hour ago
        Yes, it's one of the available emulated systems on JSLinux.
      • dmd 18 minutes ago
        If you'd clicked the link, instead of just reading the title, you'd have known it was.
  • maxloh 4 hours ago
    Unfortunately, he didn't attach the source code for the 64-bit x86 emulation layer, or the config used to compile the hosted image.

    For a more open-source version, check out container2wasm (which supports x86_64, riscv64, and AArch64 architectures): https://github.com/container2wasm/container2wasm

    [-]
    • zamadatix 3 hours ago
      https://github.com/copy/v86 might be a more 1:1 fully open sourced alternative.
      [-]
      • maxloh 3 hours ago
        Not really. x86_64 is not supported yet: https://github.com/copy/v86/issues/133
        [-]
        • zamadatix 38 minutes ago
          Sure, and there are probably some other things lacking, but JSLinux supports a lot more than CLI Linux userspace on x86-64 too. E.g. compare to lack of graphical interface https://github.com/container2wasm/container2wasm/issues/196

          It looks like container2wasm uses a forked version of Bochs to get the x86-64 kernel emulation to work. If one pulled that out separately and patched it a bit more to have the remaining feature support it'd probably be the closest overall. Of course one could say the same about patching anything with enough enthusiasm :).

  • notorandit 3 hours ago
    Incredible guy!
  • AlecMurphy 1 hour ago
    If anyone is interested, I made some modifications last month to get TempleOS running on the x86_64 JSLinux: https://ring0.holyc.xyz/
    [-]
  • wolttam 3 hours ago
    I can launch this thing and start making arbitrary connections out to port 25 on the internet from some random IP? Hmm.
    [-]
    • maxloh 3 hours ago
      From the "Technical notes" page:

      > Access to Internet is possible inside the emulator. It uses the websocket VPN offered by Benjamin Burns (see his blog). The bandwidth is capped to 40 kB/s and at most two connections are allowed per public IP address. Please don't abuse the service.

      https://bellard.org/jslinux/tech.html

  • petcat 4 hours ago
    I've always been fascinated by this, but I have never known what it would be useful for. Does anyone know of any practical use cases?
    [-]
    • postalrat 21 minutes ago
      Some sort of web based archive of applications/etc where you can boot them up in your browser.
    • omoikane 3 hours ago
      I use bellard.org/jslinux to test compilation of strange code sometimes[1], since it came with compilers that are different versions from what I have installed locally, and it's easier to open up a browser than starting a VM.

      [1] For example:

      https://www.ioccc.org/2020/yang/index.html#:~:text=tcc%200.9...

      https://www.ioccc.org/2018/yang/index.html#:~:text=tcc%200.9...

    • toast0 3 hours ago
      I use a similar emulator (v86) as a way to share my hobby OS. Approximately zero people, even my friends, are going to boot my hobby OS on real hardware; I did manage to convince some of them to run it in qemu, but it's difficult. A browser environment shows the thing quite well; and easy networking is cool too.

      My hobby OS itself is not very useful, but it's fun if you're in the right mood.

    • redleader55 3 hours ago
      Agentic workloads create and then run code. You don't want to just run that code in a "normal" environment like a container, or even a very well protected VM. There are other options, ofc - eg. gvisor, crossvm, firecracker, etc, but this one is uncommon enough to have a small number of attackers trying to hack it.
      [-]
      • srdjanr 2 hours ago
        What's wrong with a well protected VM? Especially compared to something where the security selling point is "no one uses it" (according to your argument; I don't know how secure this actually is)
        [-]
        • g947o 47 minutes ago
          Nothing, but "there are already working options" does not necessarily mean we shouldn't try new (and sometimes weird) things
    • s-macke 3 hours ago
      Most such emulators have Internet access on the IP level. Therefore, this is a very cheap way to test anything on the Internet.

          apk add nmap
          nmap your.domain.com
      
      However, the speed is heavily throttled. You can even use ssh and login to your own server.

      It can also be used as a very cheap way to provide a complete build environment on a single website, for example to teach C/C++. Or to learn the shell. You don't have to install anything.

    • varun_ch 3 hours ago
      Maybe if you’ve got some ancient software that’s missing source code and only runs with X Y and Z conditions, you could continue to offer it on the web and build around it like that? Not sure if that would be practical at all, but could be interesting
    • maxloh 3 hours ago
      My college professor used it to teach us the Linux command line

      We have Windows PCs in the classroom.

      [-]
      • jgtrosh 5 minutes ago
        Similarly I've used it for technical interviews.
  • westurner 3 hours ago
    How do TinyEmu and JSLinux compare to linux-wasm?

    From "Show HN: Amla Sandbox – WASM bash shell sandbox for AI agents" (2026) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46825119 :

    >>> How to run vscode-container-wasm-gcc-example with c2w, with joelseverin/linux-wasm?

    >> linux-wasm is apparently faster than c2w

    From "Ghostty compiled to WASM with xterm.js API compatibility" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46118267 :

    > From joelseverin/linux-wasm: https://github.com/joelseverin/linux-wasm :

    >> Hint: Wasm lacks an MMU, meaning that Linux needs to be built in a NOMMU configuration

    From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46229385 :

    >> There's a pypi:SystemdUnitParser.

  • shevy-java 2 hours ago
    He builds epicness.
  • westurner 3 hours ago
    UBY: touchscreen: How to scroll the scrollback